Page 1 of 1
Puccinia vincae on Greater Periwinkle
Posted: Wed Jun 03, 2015 5:28 pm
by Lancashire Lad
Seen today, on plants within 200yds from home.
Puccinia vincae on Greater Periwinkle -
Vinca major
Spore measurements averaging slightly larger than Wilson & Henderson's details should suggest - but calibration has been checked and measurements are correct.
I went looking for this, knowing that the plants were only around the corner, to see if there was any sign of the
Puccinia vincae having been infected with the basidiomycete "
Tuberculina sbrozzii" - but couldn't find any indication of its presence.
Click on images to view at full size.
Puccinia vincae - typical infection on both upper and lower leaf surfaces.
Puccinia vincae spores x400 - mounted in air.
Puccinia vincae spores x400 - mounted in water.
Puccinia vincae spores x400 - mounted in water - with measurement details.
Regards,
Mike.
Re: Puccinia vincae on Greater Periwinkle
Posted: Wed Jun 03, 2015 7:38 pm
by Chris Yeates
Hi
when telia appear have a good look under oil. All the books etc. I have seen talk of the teliospores being warted – e.g.
Wilson & Henderson “with verrucae arranged in irregular longitudinal lines”.
I contend that the ornamentation is of
pits not bumps. If you look at the image at top right you can see that the ‘shadow’ which Normarski contrast gives you is as if lit from approximately the “south-west” (easily seen on the spines on the urediniospores). Carry that on to the ornamentation on the teliospores and if they were raised then they too should be lit at their SW edges – they’re not; but if they are like craters then their being lit at the NE makes sense.
Also if you look at the outline of the teliospores it’s relatively smooth – not with numerous raised “bumps”. The analogy I use is a peanut shell – the depressions do not show on the profile.
Finally I think the arrowed portion of edge shows pits pretty well.
I can see why people have been confused – it’s like those optical illusions where you can’t tell if an image of a face is convex or concave; but I’ve looked at these spores long and hard and that’s what I (and others I have spoken to after showing them these images) now think. "Rustbucket" has kindly sent me an image of this species from Tom Preece's book with SEM's of UK rusts and the same think can be made out there.
So a good test for setting up your 'scope for maximum resolution

.
cheers
Chris
Re: Puccinia vincae on Greater Periwinkle
Posted: Wed Jun 03, 2015 9:18 pm
by JennyS
to see if there was any sign of the Puccinia vincae having been infected with the basidiomycete "Tuberculina sbrozzii" - but couldn't find any indication of its presence.
There's a clump of rusted Vinca I check on my way to work - still no sign of Tuberculina on it!
Re: Puccinia vincae on Greater Periwinkle
Posted: Sat Apr 08, 2023 10:19 pm
by __clare__
I have been studying a collection of
Puccinia vincae this evening and just wanted to say that I agree the teliospores look like peanuts. You provided me with the motivation to fiddle around with oil immersion and a bit of focus-stacking, so I thought I would share the result
I think I also have
Tuberculina sbrozzii parasitising my collection of
Puccinia vincae. I've posted photos and micrographs here:
https://misidentifyingfungi.blogspot.co ... eefer.html
I've never heard of
Tuberculina sbrozzii before and I haven't found much about it via the old 'Google search' technique. Can I record my collection as such? Or have I stumbled into something that's more complicated than I've bargained for?